This series is generated by the quintic rule aₙ = n⁵ − n + 1 for n starting from 1. For n = 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 we obtain 1−1+1 = 1, 32−2+1 = 31, 243−3+1 = 241, 1024−4+1 = 1021 and 3125−5+1 = 3121, exactly matching the given numbers. For n = 6 the same expression gives 6⁵−6+1 = 7776−6+1 = 7771. Therefore 7771 is the unique next term that maintains this fifth-degree pattern.
Option A:
Option A, 7729, is significantly below the computed value and does not satisfy aₙ = n⁵−n+1 for n = 6. It would require subtracting 42 from the formula’s result only at the last term. Such a deviation has no basis in the earlier behaviour of the sequence, so option A is incorrect.
Option B:
Option B, 7759, is closer but still does not equal 7771 and therefore fails to arise from applying n⁵−n+1 to n = 6. Selecting 7759 would alter the functional rule that perfectly explains all previous terms. Hence option B is not a valid continuation of the pattern.
Option C:
Option C, 7771, coincides exactly with 6⁵−6+1 and follows directly from the quintic expression. It keeps the same high-order dependence on n that produces the rapid growth observed in the sequence. Because it continues the rule without modification, 7771 is the correct next term.
Option D:
Option D, 7789, overshoots the formula’s output by 18 and cannot be expressed as n⁵−n+1 for the sixth position. Using 7789 would break the precise relationship between index and term, making option D inconsistent with the established series.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!