The differences between consecutive terms are 2, 4, 8 and 16. These are powers of two doubling at each step. To continue this pattern, the next difference should be 32. Adding 32 to the last term 31 gives 31 + 32 = 63, which extends the series in a perfectly consistent way.
Option A:
Option A gives 61, which corresponds to a difference of 30 from 31 and fails to match the next power of two. Since the previous differences are 2, 4, 8 and 16, the logical continuation is 32, not 30. Hence, 61 is not correct.
Option B:
Option B yields 63, which is 32 more than 31 and completes the power-of-two difference sequence 2, 4, 8, 16, 32. The pattern remains clean and conceptually strong. Therefore, 63 is the correct next term.
Option C:
Option C suggests 65, giving a difference of 34 from 31, which does not fit into the powers-of-two framework. Such an increment is arbitrary with respect to the earlier differences. Thus, 65 cannot be accepted.
Option D:
Option D offers 67, which is 36 greater than 31 and again unrelated to the powers-of-two idea. Using 67 would disrupt the elegant second-level pattern that defines the series. Therefore, 67 is not the right answer.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!