The holistic, 360-degree progress card proposed by NEP 2020 is meant to reflect multiple perspectives. It therefore includes inputs from teachers, the student’s own self-assessment, peer feedback and, where appropriate, parents, making assessment more comprehensive and growth-oriented.
Option A:
Relying only on external examiners gives a very limited and occasional snapshot and does not match the continuous, multi-source assessment model described in NEP.
Option B:
This option is correct because it lists the key stakeholders—teachers, learners, peers and sometimes parents—who together contribute to the new holistic progress card.
Option C:
Making only principals responsible for all student-level assessment is neither practical nor aligned with the classroom-based assessment emphasis of the policy.
Option D:
District-level inspectors focus on system monitoring and do not provide the regular, close-range feedback envisioned for individual students’ progress cards.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!