The ecological footprint combines the area needed to provide the resources a population consumes and to absorb its wastes and emissions, and then compares this demand with available biocapacity.
Option A:
Incorrect, because territorial size alone says nothing about how intensively resources are used or wastes are generated.
Option B:
Correct, as this definition captures both resource use and waste absorption in terms of biologically productive area.
Option C:
Incorrect, since population size without information on consumption patterns cannot indicate environmental pressure.
Option D:
Incorrect, because species richness is a biodiversity metric, not a direct measure of human demand on ecosystems.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!