Statement (1) presents a solvable linear equation, 3x + 2 = 20, which has a unique solution. Solving it gives x = 6, so statement (1) by itself fully determines the value of x. Statement (2) only tells us that x is an integer but gives no equation or relation to narrow down x further. Therefore, statement (2) alone does not allow us to find a unique x. In data sufficiency terms, (1) alone is sufficient while (2) alone is not.
Option A:
Option A correctly reflects that statement (1) yields a unique solution for x, and that statement (2) adds no new restrictive information when used alone.
Option B:
Option B reverses the roles of the statements and incorrectly claims that simply knowing x is an integer is sufficient to find a unique value, which is impossible without an equation.
Option C:
Option C assumes that neither statement can independently identify x, which is incorrect because statement (1) clearly does.
Option D:
Option D states that each statement alone is sufficient, but this overstates the power of statement (2), which does not determine any specific numerical value.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!