The question asks for the wrong statement about curriculum internationalisation and local relevance. Statement A is correct because adding global perspectives is a key feature of internationalisation. Statement B is correct as curricula can and should integrate local contexts along with global issues. Statement D is also correct since collaborative projects and exchanges with foreign universities enrich curriculum content. Statement C is wrong because internationalisation does not require replacing all local content with foreign material; it seeks a balanced, contextualised approach. Therefore, C alone is the wrong statement.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it groups C with D as wrong statements. While C is indeed incorrect, D accurately describes how collaborations assist curriculum internationalisation, so including it as wrong is unjustified.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it classifies A, B and C as wrong. Both A and B express valid principles of combining global and local perspectives in curriculum design, so they should not be treated as incorrect.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it labels A, C and D as wrong, thereby rejecting two correct statements along with the single wrong one. This undermines the value of global perspectives and collaboration in curriculum design.
Option D:
Option D is correct because it identifies C as the only statement that misrepresents internationalisation. It keeps A, B and D, which support a nuanced, contextual and collaborative understanding of curriculum development.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!