Statement A correctly specifies that the contrapositive of “if p then q” is “if not q then not p”. Statement C is true because a statement and its contrapositive always have the same truth table and are logically equivalent. Statement D is also correct, as the inverse of “if p then q” is “if not p then not q”. Statement B is false because it actually describes the inverse, not the converse; the converse should be “if q then p”. Therefore, the correct set of statements is A, C and D only.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete since it omits D and therefore fails to state the form of the inverse, even though A and C are true. Without D, the picture of how all four related forms are constructed remains partial. This makes the option unsuitable as the correct answer.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it excludes C and includes D alone, leaving out the explicit mention of logical equivalence between contrapositives. It does not gather all the correct statements and so cannot represent the full answer.
Option C:
Option C is wrong as it puts together C and D but omits A, so it never explicitly defines the contrapositive itself, while still not distinguishing it from other forms. The missing definition makes this combination insufficient.
Option D:
Option D is correct because it lists the definition of contrapositive, the equivalence of contrapositives and the definition of inverse, while excluding the incorrect wording in B. It therefore gives a coherent and accurate summary of conditional variants.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!