The conclusion section summarises the main findings in relation to the study’s objectives or hypotheses and articulates the key message the researcher wants readers to take away. It often highlights the practical or theoretical implications of the results and may point out suggestions for future research. This section is usually concise and located near the end of the article. Therefore, the part described in the stem is correctly called the conclusion section.
Option A:
The review of literature discusses previous research, theoretical perspectives and gaps before the new study is conducted. It provides background and justification but does not typically present or summarise the study’s own conclusions. Hence, review of literature is not the correct answer.
Option B:
The abstract offers a brief overview of the entire article at the beginning, including purpose, method and main findings, but it is not the internal section that discusses implications and future directions in detail. Thus, abstract is not the best completion.
Option C:
The methodology section explains the design, sampling, instruments and procedures used in the research. It focuses on how the study was carried out rather than on summarising the final outcomes and implications, so methodology does not fit the stem.
Option D:
The conclusion section provides closure by tying the results back to the original problem and emphasising what has been learned, which is exactly what the question is describing.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!