Case study research features – UGC NET Question

Statements A, B and D accurately describe case study research as an in-depth exploration of a bounded system using multiple data sources to develop a rich contextual understanding. Case studies often focus on detailed narratives and interpretations rather than large-scale numerical data. Statement C is false because case studies are frequently qualitative, and E is false because insights from single or multiple cases can inform and refine theory, even if generalisation is limited.

Option A:
Option A includes only A and B and omits D, which recognises that case studies are valued for their context-specific depth of understanding. Without D, the distinctive contribution of case study research to rich description and interpretation is underplayed.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it combines the three true statements about what case studies are, how they are conducted and what kind of understanding they yield. It correctly excludes C and E, which misrepresent their quantitative nature and theoretical contribution.

Option C:
Option C lists B and D but leaves out A, so it does not specify that the focus is on a bounded system such as a particular person or institution. This definitional element is important, and its absence makes the combination incomplete.

Option D:
Option D includes E, the claim that case studies can never inform theory, which contradicts many examples where case-based insights have shaped theoretical ideas. Therefore, this option mixes a false statement with true ones and cannot be accepted.