Buddhist momentariness doctrine – UGC NET Question

Statements A, B, D and E correctly represent the Buddhist doctrine of momentariness, while C is false. The view holds that conditioned entities last only for a kṣaṇa and that supposed enduring substances are conceptual impositions, which undermines substantialist metaphysics and notions of a permanent self. This perspective shapes Buddhist explanations of causation and personal identity, and UGC NET questions often connect it to logical problems about change. Nyaya criticises, rather than fully accepts, this momentariness, making C incorrect.

Option A:
Option A is incomplete as it omits E, failing to mention explicitly how this doctrine can appear in exam questions. A, B, D only therefore does not fully meet the stem’s requirements.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it brings together the main doctrinal points and the exam relevance, while excluding C, which misstates Nyaya’s stance. This combination aligns closely with standard summaries of kṣaṇikatvāda.

Option C:
Option C is wrong since it omits A and therefore fails to state clearly the core thesis that all conditioned things are momentary. B, D, E only thus gives a partial and less precise account.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect as it includes C along with other true statements, wrongly suggesting inter-school agreement where there is actually debate. A, C, D, E only therefore mixes false information with correct material.