Statements A, B, C and E correctly describe validity and soundness, while D is clearly false. Validity concerns the relationship between premises and conclusion such that true premises cannot yield a false conclusion, and soundness adds the factual truth of premises. A valid argument may still have false premises, so C is also correct. Sound arguments must have true conclusions, not false ones, hence D is rejected, and all the true statements together are captured by option B.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it omits E, ignoring the explicit relevance of distinguishing validity and truth in UGC NET reasoning questions. Although A, B and C are true, leaving out E means the set is incomplete. This combination does not fully answer the question as stated.
Option B:
Option B is correct since it includes exactly the true statements A, B, C and E and excludes D, which wrongly claims that sound arguments must end in false conclusions. This option therefore matches standard textbook definitions and exam practice. It recognises that soundness guarantees a true conclusion, the opposite of what D asserts.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it leaves out A, the central definition of validity, and thus fails to include all the correct statements. Even though B, C and E are true, missing A makes the combination partially accurate only. Hence it cannot be the right answer.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it omits B, the definition of soundness, which is essential in this context, and still includes only part of the true set. A, C, E only therefore fails to capture the complete group of correct statements required by the question.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!