UGCNET Questions

Feedback is the response that travels from receiver back to sender. In the classroom, students’ questions, facial expressions and performance provide the teacher with evidence about how messages are being interpreted. When teachers attend to this feedback, they can clarify misconceptions, change examples, modify pace or revisit topics.

Option A:
Option A stresses that feedback informs the teacher about the effectiveness of communication and guides adaptive teaching, aligning with a responsive, learner-centred approach.

Option B:
Option B suggests increasing teacher talk, but feedback usually reduces monologue and encourages student voice instead of prolonging one-way delivery.

Option C:
Option C equates effectiveness with silence; in reality, silence may hide confusion, whereas active feedback reveals true levels of understanding.

Option D:
Option D assumes feedback removes the need for assessment; while feedback improves learning, formal evaluations are still required to measure achievement systematically.

Two way communication involves both teacher and students actively sending and receiving messages. When learners ask questions or respond to prompts, they reveal how they are interpreting the content. This feedback enables the teacher to identify misconceptions, give clarifications and adapt examples or pace, while students become active participants in constructing understanding.

Option A:
Option A focuses on uninterrupted teacher control, which is typical of one-way communication and often limits opportunities to detect learning problems.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it summarises that two way communication both enhances participation and provides feedback, making it pedagogically superior for deep learning.

Option C:
Option C suggests that planning is unnecessary, but interactive teaching actually requires careful planning of questions, activities and transitions to harness feedback effectively.

Option D:
Option D overpromises outcomes; while two way communication improves learning conditions, exam performance still depends on many factors and cannot be guaranteed as perfect.

Linear models, such as early mathematical models, depict communication as a straight line from sender to receiver with little attention to feedback or context. Transactional models, in contrast, see communication as a dynamic process where both parties are simultaneously senders and receivers. They stress mutual influence, continuous feedback and the role of context. This distinction is central when comparing older and more contemporary perspectives on communication.

Option A:
Option A correctly highlights that linear models are primarily one way and sequential, while transactional models view communication as two way and interactive. It notes the importance of feedback and simultaneity, which transactional models incorporate in explaining real life communication.

Option B:
Option B reverses the features, claiming that linear models focus on simultaneous interaction and transactional models ignore feedback. This misrepresents both models and is conceptually incorrect.

Option C:
Option C is wrong because transactional models actually give greater importance to nonverbal cues, context and simultaneous verbal and nonverbal exchanges. Neither model is defined by excluding nonverbal communication.

Option D:
Option D incorrectly ties each model to a particular medium. Both linear and transactional models are abstract frameworks that can apply to oral, written or mediated communication; they are not restricted by channel type.

Two way communication includes both message delivery and response from receivers. In the classroom, when students can ask questions, express views and receive clarifications, they become active participants rather than passive recipients. Feedback helps the teacher to sense confusion and address it immediately. This mutual exchange leads to deeper understanding and greater engagement compared to purely one way lecturing.

Option A:
Option A suggests avoiding questions to save time, but this undermines comprehension and motivation. If students never have the chance to seek clarification, misconceptions remain and the apparent time saving is lost later.

Option B:
Option B emphasizes learner participation and feedback, which are widely cited as key benefits of interactive teaching methods. It captures how two way communication supports clarification and collaborative construction of knowledge, making it superior to purely one way communication in most learning contexts.

Option C:
Option C describes a situation where the teacher speaks continuously without interruption, which is characteristic of one way lecturing. This reduces interaction and does not represent an advantage of two way communication.

Option D:
Option D assumes that interaction removes the need for planning, but effective two way teaching often requires even more thoughtful planning to allow time for questions, activities and discussion.

Feedback is the response of the receiver that travels back to the sender. In the classroom, students’ questions, expressions and performance provide cues about their level of understanding. When teachers attend to this feedback, they can adjust the pace, clarify doubts, or change strategies. Feedback therefore functions as a control mechanism that enhances effectiveness of teaching learning.

Option A:
Option A suggests ignoring students’ difficulties, which is opposite to the purpose of feedback. If teachers continue as planned without responding to learners’ signals, misunderstandings remain uncorrected and learning outcomes suffer.

Option B:
Option B correctly states that feedback enables teachers to judge students’ comprehension and adapt teaching accordingly. It captures the dynamic, responsive nature of effective classroom communication and reflects the two way character of interaction.

Option C:
Option C treats silence as the main goal, but strict silence can actually suppress questions and feedback. Without student responses, the teacher cannot accurately gauge understanding.

Option D:
Option D implies that feedback removes the need for assessments, but formal tests and assignments still play an important role in evaluating learning over time. Feedback during lessons complements, rather than replaces, assessment.