The Limits to Growth concept,popularised by the Club of Rome study,uses systems models to argue that exponential growth in population,industry and resource use cannot continue indefinitely on a finite planet. It warns that surpassing ecological limits could trigger sudden decline or collapse. The idea calls for stabilising both economic and population growth within sustainable bounds. Thus the description in the question clearly refers to limits to growth.
Option A:
The tragedy of the commons explains how individual users acting in self interest can over exploit a shared resource. While related to resource depletion,it does not explicitly model global population and economic growth overshooting planetary limits. Therefore it is not the exact concept described.
Option B:
Demographic dividend emphasises economic opportunities created by a favourable age structure,not planetary boundaries. It is generally seen as positive and does not focus on ecological collapse. Hence it does not match the statement in the stem.
Option C:
Ecological modernisation suggests that environmental protection and economic growth can be reconciled through technological innovation and institutional reform. It is more optimistic than the limits to growth perspective. Thus it is not the term intended by the question.
Option D:
Limits to Growth specifically examines interactions among population,industrial output,resource use and pollution. It concludes that without deliberate stabilisation policies,these factors may exceed planetary carrying capacities. This argument is exactly what the stem summarises.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!