NEP 2020 highlights peer tutoring as a low-cost, effective strategy, particularly for foundational literacy and numeracy. Older or more advanced students can assist others under a teacherβs supervision, making learning more personalised and collaborative.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because NEP explicitly notes that peer tutoring can be effective; it does not advise avoiding it.
Option B:
Option B is correct as it matches NEPβs recommendation to use peer support, especially for FLN, under proper teacher guidance.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect since NEP does not propose replacing teachers; peer tutoring is meant to supplement, not substitute, teacher-led instruction.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because peer tutoring can be useful at various levels, including school education, not only in higher education.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!