Statements A, B and C accurately capture the design and objectives of RUSA. Statement A is true because RUSA is a centrally sponsored scheme meant specifically to support and reform state higher education systems. Statement B is correct, as the scheme seeks to improve access, equity and quality in state universities and colleges. Statement C is also true since funding is linked to performance and the preparation of comprehensive State Higher Education Plans, whereas statement D is false because RUSA does not focus exclusively on centrally funded institutions.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it recognises only A and B and leaves out C. Performance-linked funding and the requirement for State Higher Education Plans are key features of RUSA’s implementation strategy. Excluding C omits an essential part of the scheme’s design.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it combines A, B and C, presenting a comprehensive view of the scheme’s nature, goals and funding mechanism. It also correctly excludes D, which contradicts the scheme’s purpose of supporting state institutions. This makes it the only option consistent with policy documents.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it includes D along with B and C and ignores A. Statement D wrongly states that RUSA funds only centrally supported institutions, which is contrary to its focus on states. Hence this combination cannot be accepted.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it joins A and C but leaves out B. Omitting the explicit emphasis on access, equity and quality makes the description incomplete, as these are central aims of RUSA.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!