The discussion section interprets the results by explaining what they mean in relation to the original problem, objectives and hypotheses. It connects the findings to existing theories and prior research, highlighting consistencies, contradictions and implications. This section also often points out limitations and suggests future research directions. Therefore, the part of a report that logically explains findings in the theoretical context is correctly called the discussion.
Option A:
The abstract is a brief summary of the entire study and does not provide detailed interpretation of results. It simply states key findings without extended theoretical explanation. Consequently, abstract does not match the in-depth interpretive role described in the stem.
Option B:
The methodology section outlines the design, sampling, instruments and procedures used in the study. Although it may mention rationale for choices, it does not focus on explaining what the results mean. Hence, methodology is not the correct completion.
Option C:
In the discussion, the researcher evaluates whether the findings support the hypotheses, considers alternative explanations and addresses practical or theoretical implications. This reflective analysis is central to understanding the significance of the results and aligns exactly with the description given in the question.
Option D:
The introduction frames the problem, sets objectives and summarises relevant literature before the study is conducted. It looks forward rather than backward to interpret findings, so introduction is not appropriate for the section mentioned in the stem.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!