Statements A, B, C, E and F are correct, while D is false. UpamÄna is indeed characterised as comparison, with the gavaya example being widely cited in textbooks. Nyaya treats it as an independent pramÄáša, although some other schools attempt to reduce it to combinations of perception and verbal testimony. UGC NET questions sometimes embed such scenarios and ask which source of knowledge is being used. D is wrong because it overstates the agreement among schools and ignores Nyayaâs insistence on a distinct process.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete since it omits E and F, which acknowledge both the reductionist view of some schools and the examination pattern. While A, B and C describe Nyayaâs standpoint and example, they do not cover inter-school debate or test relevance. Hence A, B and C only is not a complete answer.
Option B:
Option B is also incomplete because it still leaves out F and includes only A, B, C and E. Without F, the answer does not mention how upamÄna-based questions appear in UGC NET. Therefore A, B, C and E only cannot be regarded as fully adequate.
Option C:
Option C is correct because it collects all the true statements, presenting Nyayaâs independent-pramÄáša view, other schoolsâ criticisms and the exam angle, while excluding D, which falsely merges upamÄna completely with inference. It thus reflects the nuanced treatment of upamÄna in Indian epistemology. Consequently, A, B, C, E and F only is the right combination.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect as it leaves out A and includes only B, C, E and F. Without A, the general translation and role of comparison are not clearly set out, and the omission makes the description less complete. Therefore B, C, E and F only cannot be the correct choice.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!