Statements A, B, C, E and F correctly summarise the traditional conditions for a proper hetu, while D is false. The hetu must qualify the pakį¹£a, coincide with the sÄdhya in positive instances and be absent when the sÄdhya is absent, thereby supporting a reliable vyÄpti. If any of these conditions fail, the middle term can become fallacious, which is what hetvÄbhÄsa denotes. D is wrong because a sÄdhÄraį¹a hetu that spreads across vipakį¹£a as well is defective, not strong. UGC NET may test recognition of which condition is violated in sample inferences.
Option A:
Option A is correct since it includes the three core lakį¹£aį¹as of a valid hetu, the connection to hetvÄbhÄsa and the exam-oriented point about identifying violations. It excludes D, which elevates a defective sÄdhÄraį¹a hetu to a strong one, contradicting standard accounts. Thus this option accurately represents the set of correct statements.
Option B:
Option B is incomplete because it omits E and F, leaving out both the link to fallacious reasoning and the exam application. While A, B and C are true, they do not show what happens when the conditions fail or how they are tested. Therefore A, B and C only is not fully adequate.
Option C:
Option C is also incomplete as it leaves out F, the statement about UGC NET questions explicitly using these conditions. Without F, the answer does not reflect the way the topic appears in the syllabus. Hence A, B, C and E only cannot be the best choice.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it omits A and includes only B, C, E and F. Without A, the requirement that the hetu be present in the pakį¹£a itself is missing, which is fundamental. This omission means the option does not incorporate all the correct statements in the list.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!