Statements A, B, C and E are standard guidelines for good report writing, while D is false. Research reports should be coherent, avoid unnecessary jargon, present tables and figures clearly and maintain an objective and precise tone. Statement D is wrong because transparently reporting limitations is considered good scholarly practice; hiding them undermines the credibility of the study. Thus, the correct combination includes A, B, C and E.
Option A:
Option A restricts itself to A, B and C and omits E, ignoring the importance of an objective and precise academic style in framing arguments and interpretations. This omission leaves the description of good writing incomplete.
Option B:
Option B leaves out B itself and focuses only on A, C and E, which fails to mention that overuse of technical terms can hinder understanding for broader audiences. As a result, it does not reflect all key aspects of readability.
Option C:
Option C is correct because it brings together logical organisation, avoidance of excessive jargon, clear presentation of tables and figures and an appropriate academic style, while excluding D, which encourages poor reporting practice.
Option D:
Option D includes D, the recommendation to omit limitations, which contradicts accepted norms of transparency. Even though some other statements are true, the inclusion of D invalidates the option.
Option E retains D and therefore also becomes unacceptable, as it promotes concealing weaknesses rather than acknowledging them honestly.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!