UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Statements A, B, C, D and F correctly describe similarities and differences between Nyaya and Western approaches, while E is false. Western syllogisms use a three-part structure, whereas Nyaya sets out five members to make explicit the thesis, reason, example, application and conclusion. This expanded form highlights vyāpti and its relation to the pakṣa, and exam items may unpack common examples into these steps. Both traditions, however, aim to justify conclusions with reasons. E is wrong because Western logic can represent long chains of reasoning by linking several arguments. Thus A, B, C, D and F only is the correct combination.

Option A:
Option A is correct since it draws a balanced comparison, showing structural differences without exaggerating them into absolute opposition. It also ties the theory to typical UGC NET questions. By excluding E, it avoids the mistaken idea that Western logic is limited to only three-step arguments.

Option B:
Option B is incomplete because it omits F, missing the important concluding point that both traditions share the goal of valid reasoning. Without F, the comparison sounds more divisive than it actually is. Therefore A, B, C and D only is not fully adequate.

Option C:
Option C is wrong as it includes E, treating Western logic as incapable of handling longer chains, which is clearly false in both classical and modern systems. Even simple derivations can involve many steps. Including E makes the combination unreliable.

Option D:
Option D is incorrect since it leaves out C and includes E, thereby ignoring the explicit role of vyāpti while accepting a false limitation on Western arguments. This mixture does not accurately reflect comparative logic.