Statements A, B, C and E correctly explain how truth tables are used to test validity, while D and F are false. Validity is checked by looking for a counterexample row with true premises and false conclusion, and the absence of such a row shows validity. The number of rows indeed increases exponentially with the number of distinct simple propositions. D is wrong because truth tables work for any finite number of premises, and F is unrealistic about exam expectations, where simpler reasoning is usually sufficient.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it omits E, failing to mention the key fact that truth table size grows rapidly with the number of propositions. While A, B and C correctly describe the validity test, they do not fully address the structure of truth tables. Hence this option does not contain all the correct statements.
Option B:
Option B is correct since it brings together the procedural rules for testing validity and the structural observation about row growth, without adding the unrealistic or incorrect claims of D and F. It captures both conceptual understanding and practical awareness. Therefore this option is consistent with how truth tables are taught for UGC NET.
Option C:
Option C is wrong because it includes F, implying that students must always construct very large tables during the exam, which is not expected at Paper 1 level. It also omits Cβs explicit statement of the condition for validity. This combination therefore misrepresents both difficulty and method.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect as it includes F and omits A, losing the basic explanation of how truth tables identify invalidity. With F present, it misleads students about exam requirements, and the absence of A leaves out the essential test for counterexamples. Thus B, C, E and F only cannot be the right answer.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!