NEP 2020 envisages NETF as an independent forum that studies educational technology, shares best practices and advises governments and institutions on effective, evidence-based edtech integration. It is meant to support informed decision-making, not to sell products or impose penalties.
Option A:
A commercial gadget-selling company focuses on profit and hardware sales, which is very different from the advisory and knowledge-sharing role described for NETF.
Option B:
This option is correct because it captures NETF as an autonomous, non-regulatory body that facilitates free exchange of ideas and offers guidance on the use of technology in education.
Option C:
A punitive regulator that “punishes” schools for using technology is not what NEP 2020 proposes; the policy emphasises supportive guidance rather than punishment.
Option D:
Handling only social media entertainment content is far too narrow and unrelated to the broad educational technology mandate given to NETF.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!