Q: Which of the following statements about arthÄpatti and anupalabdhi in Indian epistemology are correct?
(A) ArthÄpatti (postulation) involves inferring an unseen fact to explain an apparent inconsistency between known facts;
(B) Anupalabdhi (non-cognition) is sometimes treated as a distinct pramÄį¹a for knowing absences;
(C) The classic example āDevadatta is fat and does not eat by day; therefore he must be eating at nightā illustrates arthÄpatti;
(D) According to MÄ«mÄį¹sÄ philosophers, arthÄpatti cannot simply be reduced to ordinary inference based on pre-known vyÄpti;
(E) All Indian philosophical schools reject arthÄpatti and anupalabdhi as illegitimate sources of knowledge;
(F) UGC NET questions may ask candidates to recognise these as special pramÄį¹as accepted by some schools without entering into detailed debates;
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!