Statements A, B and C together provide a nuanced view of ranking frameworks. Statement A is true because published rankings often influence perceptions among students, parents and employers. Statement B is true as excessive focus on ranking positions can push institutions to chase indicators rather than overall educational quality and mission. Statement C is also true since thoughtful institutions can use ranking data as one input for benchmarking and planning improvements. Statement D is false because rankings use particular methodologies, and not all high-quality institutions will always appear at the top. Therefore, A, B and C only form the correct combination.
Option A:
Option A is incomplete because it includes only A and B and omits C, ignoring the constructive use of ranking data for self-improvement and strategic planning.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect because it selects A and C but leaves out B, thereby failing to mention the potential distortion of priorities when rankings are overemphasised.
Option C:
Option C is correct because it integrates A, B and C, acknowledging both the influence and risks of rankings and their potential diagnostic value, while excluding D, which oversimplifies the relationship between quality and ranking positions.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it includes D, which wrongly assumes that all high-quality institutions must top every ranking, an assumption that does not hold given diverse ranking criteria.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!