Classical NyÄya recognises exactly four independent pramÄį¹as: perception (pratyakį¹£a), inference (anumÄna), comparison (upamÄna) and verbal testimony (Åabda). Each is treated as a distinct and irreducible means of valid knowledge. Other candidate pramÄį¹as are either reduced to these or rejected as independent. Therefore the list that contains precisely these four is the correct one for classical NyÄya.
Option A:
Option A lists the standard NyÄya four: perception, inference, comparison and testimony. It neither omits any accepted pramÄį¹a nor adds any that NyÄya does not treat as independent. This makes it fully consistent with NyÄya epistemological texts.
Option B:
Option B replaces comparison with memory, but memory is generally considered mere reproduction of past knowledge and not an independent pramÄį¹a. Hence the set does not match NyÄyaās list.
Option C:
Option C omits inference and adds presumption, which classical NyÄya does not accept as a separate pramÄį¹a, so the classification becomes misleading.
Option D:
Option D adds non perception as if NyÄya had a separate pramÄį¹a for absence; that status is debated in later schools and is not part of the classical fourfold scheme.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!