NyÄya holds that anumiti (inferential cognition) arises when the mind apprehends the hetu in the pakį¹£a under the remembered vyÄpti with the sÄdhya. This focused relational awareness is called liį¹
ga parÄmarÅa. It is the immediate internal cause of inferential knowledge: only when the middle term is seen as pervaded by the major term in that particular subject does the inferential conclusion arise.
Option A:
Option A refers to nigamana, the expressed conclusion in parÄrthÄnumÄna, which is a verbal product, not the inner causal cognition.
Option B:
Option B correctly characterises liį¹
ga parÄmarÅa as the mental grasp of the middle term in the pakį¹£a along with its universal relation to the sÄdhya, which directly produces anumiti.
Option C:
Option C describes udÄharaį¹a, the illustrative example (like āa kitchen where there is smoke and fireā) used to communicate vyÄpti, not the specific mental act in the pakį¹£a.
Option D:
Option D is merely the initial perception of the subject and does not yet relate the hetu to the sÄdhya through vyÄpti, so it cannot by itself generate inference.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!