A sufficient condition is one whose presence guarantees that a certain event or property will occur, even though the event might also arise in other ways. If the sufficient condition holds, the specified outcome must follow. This notion is central in both logic and causal reasoning where we want to know what factors are enough to bring about a result. Hence the condition described in the stem is a sufficient condition.
Option A:
Option A, necessary, refers to a condition that must be present for an event to occur but may not be enough on its own to produce it. Necessity emphasises requirement, not guarantee, and so does not match the wording in the question.
Option B:
Option B is correct because sufficiency highlights that the condition is adequate on its own to secure the event. For example, being a square is sufficient for being a rectangle, since every square is automatically a rectangle. This captures the sense of “enough by itself” mentioned in the stem.
Option C:
Option C, accidental, suggests that a factor accompanies an event by chance and does not reliably bring it about. Accidental conditions fail to meet the requirement of guaranteeing the outcome.
Option D:
Option D, remote, implies distance or weak relevance and is not a standard logical term for describing the relation between conditions and events. It does not indicate any guarantee of occurrence.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!