UGC NET Questions (Paper – 1)

Credibility in communication theory depends largely on perceived expertise and trustworthiness of the source. A teacher who understands the subject deeply, explains concepts accurately, admits uncertainties and treats students fairly is seen as both competent and honest. This combination makes learners more willing to trust and accept the teacher’s messages.

Option A:
Option A describes limited knowledge with high entertainment value. While entertainment may attract attention, lack of subject expertise weakens credibility because students doubt the accuracy of information.

Option B:
Option B is correct because it brings together expertise, honesty and fairness—classic dimensions of source credibility in educational contexts—and encourages students to view the teacher as knowledgeable and ethically reliable.

Option C:
Option C, exaggerating facts to impress, undermines trust once students detect inconsistencies or inaccuracies.

Option D:
Option D, arbitrarily changing grading standards, signals unfairness and unpredictability, which also erode students’ confidence in the teacher’s communication.