NEP 2020 recognises ODL as an important mode for expanding access. However, it clearly states that ODL must adhere to the same quality benchmarks and expected learning outcomes as regular programmes. Regulatory bodies must ensure this equivalence so that ODL degrees are credible.
Option A:
Suggesting lower standards for ODL would harm student trust and the value of qualifications. NEP explicitly avoids such a stance, so this option is incorrect.
Option B:
This option aligns with NEPβs insistence on parity of quality, irrespective of mode. It highlights the need for rigorous design and evaluation, making this the correct representation of the policy.
Option C:
Replacing all face to face programmes with ODL is not proposed. The policy supports blended and flexible models rather than a complete shift to distance education.
Option D:
Banning ODL entirely would contradict NEPβs goal of increasing GER and lifelong learning opportunities. Hence this option does not match the policy.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!