The dependency ratio compares the number of dependents (children and the elderly) with the number of working-age people. A high ratio means that each worker must support more non-working individuals through taxes, family transfers or community support. This can strain public finances, household incomes and social services. Therefore, the statement that highlights a large share of young or old dependents and increased burden on workers correctly explains the implication of a high dependency ratio.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because a high proportion of working-age people would actually lower the dependency ratio, not raise it. In that case, fewer dependents rely on each worker, potentially easing economic pressure.
Option B:
Option B is incorrect as a high dependency ratio usually reflects the presence of many children and/or elderly, not their absence. Saying there are no elderly people contradicts the notion of a large dependent group.
Option C:
Option C is correct since it directly links the ratio to economic and social burden on those who are economically active. It reflects why age structure is important for planning pensions, education and employment policies.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because if all citizens were economically independent, there would effectively be no dependents and the dependency ratio would be very low. This scenario does not align with the idea of a high dependency ratio.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!