In the inductive method, teaching begins with specific instances or observations and moves towards generalizations or rules. Learners examine examples, identify patterns and formulate principles. This approach is especially useful in subjects like mathematics and science where rules can be derived from concrete cases. Therefore, presenting examples first and then deriving a general rule illustrates the inductive method.
Option A:
Inductive method emphasizes discovery of rules through analysis of particular cases. When students are led from instances to a general statement, they are engaging in inductive reasoning. This pattern matches the procedure described in the stem, so this option is correct.
Option B:
Deductive method reverses the sequence by presenting the general rule first and then applying it to specific problems. It starts from the abstract and moves to the concrete. Because the stem describes moving from examples to a rule, deductive is not appropriate here.
Option C:
Demonstration method focuses on showing a process or experiment step by step while students observe. Although examples may be used, the primary aim is to illustrate procedures rather than derive rules. Thus, it is not the best label for reasoning from examples to generalizations.
Option D:
Project method centres on student-led work on real-life tasks or projects over an extended period. It involves planning, execution and evaluation of an integrated activity. This method is broader and does not specifically describe the movement from examples to general rules as stated in the question.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!