The understanding level of teaching emphasizes comprehension rather than mere recall. At this level, learners are expected to interpret concepts, explain relationships and reorganize information meaningfully. Teaching strategies focus on questioning, discussion and explanation that promote deeper processing of content. Therefore, when learners interpret ideas and explain relationships, the teaching corresponds to the understanding level.
Option A:
Understanding level of teaching encourages students to go beyond memorization to grasp meanings and connections among ideas. This option highlights the role of reasoning and explanation, which is central to the description in the stem. It fits well with the idea of structuring learning so that students can interpret and relate concepts.
Option B:
Memory level of teaching deals largely with rote learning and reproduction of information without requiring genuine comprehension. It relies heavily on drill and repetition. As such, it does not match situations where the emphasis is on interpreting ideas and understanding relationships.
Option C:
Reflective level of teaching involves dealing with problem situations, hypothesis testing and independent decision-making. While it includes understanding, it also demands higher-order reflection and evaluation. The stem does not mention such complex processes, so reflective level is not the best fit.
Option D:
Drill-based level of teaching is not a formal category in the classical classification of levels of teaching. It informally refers to repetitive practice but does not capture the emphasis on interpretation and explanation. Hence, this option is less appropriate than the understanding level.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!