Statements A, B, D and E correctly link collaborative tools with academic integrity, while C and F are clearly unacceptable. Shared documents do support group drafting and require proper citation of external sources. Version history aids in tracking who contributed what, and institutional policies clarify boundaries of acceptable collaboration. Claims that plagiarism disappears in shared spaces or that unacknowledged copy-paste is acceptable are false, so any combination including C or F cannot be correct.
Option A:
Option A is incorrect because it omits E, which recognises the importance of institutional policies governing collaboration and plagiarism. While A, B and D are true, they do not fully capture the policy framework within which collaboration occurs. The absence of E makes this combination incomplete as an answer to the question.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it includes all and only the true statements A, B, D and E. It emphasises collaborative drafting, continued need for citation, traceability through version history and the role of policies. By excluding C and F, it rejects the mistaken belief that shared documents remove plagiarism concerns or legitimise unattributed copying.
Option C:
Option C is incorrect because it incorporates C along with otherwise true statements. Statement C falsely asserts that plagiarism is no longer a concern when everyone can edit a document. Including this statement normalises unethical behaviour, so the presence of C invalidates the whole combination.
Option D:
Option D is incorrect because it introduces F and omits A. Statement F condones unattributed copying, which contradicts academic integrity principles. Leaving out A also means ignoring the basic benefit of collaborative tools, so this set cannot be accepted as correct.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!