Let the original numbers be 4x and 7x. After adding 8 to each, the new numbers are 4x + 8 and 7x + 8 and their ratio is 5:8. So (4x + 8)/(7x + 8) = 5/8. Cross-multiplying gives 8(4x + 8) = 5(7x + 8), which simplifies to 32x + 64 = 35x + 40 and then to 3x = 24, so x = 8. The original numbers are 32 and 56, and the larger is 56.
Option A:
Option A, 40, does not appear as either 4x or 7x when x = 8 and would not preserve the required ratio 4:7 together with its pair. If we assume 40 as the larger number, the smaller would be less than 40, leading to a ratio different from 4:7 and a different transformed ratio after adding 8. Thus 40 is inconsistent with the given conditions.
Option B:
Option B, 48, might be guessed by partial calculation but does not satisfy the equation (4x + 8)/(7x + 8) = 5/8 when treated as the larger number. With 48 as the larger term, the corresponding smaller term from ratio 4:7 would be non-integral or lead to a different new ratio after adding 8. Hence 48 is not correct.
Option C:
Option C is correct because with x = 8 the original numbers are 4 ร 8 = 32 and 7 ร 8 = 56, which are in the ratio 4:7. After adding 8, we get 40 and 64, whose ratio is 40:64 = 5:8, exactly matching the condition. This confirms 56 as the unique value for the larger original number.
Option D:
Option D, 64, is the larger number after the increment rather than before it in the correct solution. Treating 64 as the original larger number would produce a much bigger value after adding 8 and the resulting ratio would no longer become 5:8. Thus 64 does not align with the stated transformation.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!