From x:y = 4:7, we write x = 4k and y = 7k. From y:z = 21:10, we write y = 21m and z = 10m. Equating y gives 7k = 21m, so k = 3m. Substituting back, x = 4k = 12m and z = 10m, so x:z = 12m:10m = 6:5. Thus, 6:5 is the correct compound ratio of x to z.
Option A:
Option A, 4:5, would require x to be 4 units when z is 5 units, which is not consistent with x = 12m and z = 10m derived from solving the two given ratios simultaneously. If we force 4:5, we cannot maintain both x:y = 4:7 and y:z = 21:10 at the same time.
Option B:
Option B is correct because it results from a systematic elimination of the common term y and then simplifying the resulting x:z ratio. The use of a common multiple for y ensures that the structure of both original ratios is respected. This guaranteed alignment leads uniquely to 6:5.
Option C:
Option C, 8:5, would make x comparatively smaller than 12m when measured against z = 10m, breaking the proportional link with y. No consistent choice of scaling parameters k and m will give x:z = 8:5 without contradicting the given ratios.
Option D:
Option D, 12:7, mixes the numerator from x = 12m with an unrelated denominator. A ratio of 12:7 would not maintain the numerical relationships defined by 4:7 and 21:10 and therefore fails the internal consistency check.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!