Each term after the first is obtained by doubling the previous term and adding 1. We have 3 × 2 + 1 = 7, 7 × 2 + 1 = 15, 15 × 2 + 1 = 31 and 31 × 2 + 1 = 63. Applying the same rule again gives 63 × 2 + 1 = 127. This keeps the recursive structure consistent and explains every transition in the series.
Option A:
Option A gives 127, which fits the rule "double the previous term and add one" exactly. The extended sequence 3, 7, 15, 31, 63, 127 maintains a single, simple recursive pattern. Therefore, 127 is the correct next term for this number series.
Option B:
Option B provides 125, which would correspond to subtracting 1 after doubling or using a different constant, neither of which is supported by earlier terms. This breaks the consistent "+1" part of the rule. Hence, 125 cannot be considered correct.
Option C:
Option C suggests 129, which would require adding 3 after doubling 63, changing the constant in the recursive expression. No previous step uses "+3," so this option does not follow the observed pattern. Therefore, 129 is not appropriate.
Option D:
Option D presents 130, which is 67 more than 63 and does not come from doubling and adding a fixed small constant. This makes the relationship unclear and inconsistent with the earlier rule. Thus, 130 is not the right answer.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!