NEP 2020 states that both public and private HEIs will be held to the same quality standards under a common regulatory framework, with private institutions expected to be philanthropic and reinvest surpluses in education rather than operate as profit-maximising businesses.
Option A:
Allowing complete freedom without regulation could harm students and is the opposite of the “light but tight” regulation the policy proposes.
Option B:
This option is correct because it captures the idea of a single regulatory system for all HEIs, focusing on quality and transparency rather than ownership.
Option C:
Banning private institutions would drastically reduce capacity and diversity, which NEP does not recommend.
Option D:
Treating profit distribution as the primary goal conflicts with the educational mission and with norms requiring surpluses to be ploughed back into the institution.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!