Nyāya holds that anumiti (inferential cognition) arises when the mind apprehends the hetu in the pakṣa along with the remembered vyāpti. This focused grasping of the middle term as pervaded by the major term in that locus is called liṅga parāmarśa and is treated as the immediate psychological cause of inferential knowledge.
Option A:
Option A describes nigamana, the final verbal statement of the conclusion in a parārthānumāna, not the internal mental state that produces anumiti.
Option B:
Option B correctly identifies liṅga parāmarśa as the mental apprehension of the middle term in the pakṣa under the universal concomitance with the sādhya, which Nyāya treats as the direct cause of inference.
Option C:
Option C refers to dṛṣṭānta, the illustrative example used to convince others, which is part of external argumentation, not the inner cause of anumiti.
Option D:
Option D reduces liṅga parāmarśa to mere perception of the pakṣa; simple perception without relating the hetu to vyāpti is not yet inferential cognition.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!