Upamāna is typically defined as the means of knowing the relation between a word and its denotatum through similarity, often illustrated by the gavaya (wild ox) example. One first hears “a gavaya is like a cow but lives in the forest,” and later, on seeing such an animal, recognises “this is a gavaya” by comparison. This involves neither straightforward perception alone nor ordinary inference; it is a special comparison based cognition.
Option A:
Option A describes inference (anumāna) from smoke to fire, not comparison, so it does not exemplify upamāna.
Option B:
Option B correctly presents the classic gavaya case, where comparison between a known cow and a new animal allows us to fix the meaning of the word “gavaya.”
Option C:
Option C concerns śabda pramāṇa, where valid testimony from scripture or a trusted person produces knowledge.
Option D:
Option D involves smṛti, or memory, which is recollection of a past event rather than fresh knowledge gained by comparison.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!