When we say X is necessary for Y, we mean that Y cannot occur without X. Here, the machine working (Y) cannot happen without electricity (X). In conditional form, that becomes: if the machine works, then electricity is present. This does not say that electricity alone is sufficient to make the machine work; it only says that working implies the presence of electricity.
Option A:
Option A correctly reverses the verbal statement into a conditional where the occurrence of machine functioning guarantees that electricity is available. It respects the asymmetry between necessity and sufficiency.
Option B:
Option B treats electricity as sufficient for the machine to work, which is stronger than what “necessary” states and may not be true if other conditions are required.
Option C:
Option C claims that a failure of the machine implies electricity is present, which is unrelated to the notion of electricity being required for proper functioning.
Option D:
Option D contradicts the original statement by saying the machine works even when the necessary condition, electricity, is absent.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up
Answers commented by others
No answers commented yet. Be the first to comment!