Plagiarism detection tools compare submitted text with large databases of published work and web content to highlight matching segments. When used ethically, they help students and researchers spot unintentional copying and improve paraphrasing and citation. The goal is to ensure originality and correct acknowledgement of sources, not simply to avoid detection. The described scenario fits this constructive use.
Option A:
This option shows a student using plagiarism software to detect overlapping text and then revising the draft and adding proper citations. It treats the tool as an aid to academic honesty rather than as a way to “beat” the system, which is exactly the recommended practice.
Option B:
This option relies on copying entire articles without citation and ignoring any checking tools. It is a straightforward example of plagiarism and violates basic principles of academic integrity.
Option C:
Avoiding reading sources in order to prevent overlap undermines scholarship; good research builds on existing literature. Refusing to consult prior work prevents understanding the field and is not a valid strategy.
Option D:
Deleting references conceals intellectual debts and misleads readers about the originality of the work. It is clearly unethical and can amount to academic misconduct.
Comment Your Answer
Please login to comment your answer.
Sign In
Sign Up