UGCNET Questions

Words like “therefore,” “thus,” and “so” are common conclusion indicators in natural language. They signal that what follows is being presented as a result of previously stated reasons. When a speaker uses “therefore,” they mark a transition from premises to the conclusion that those premises are intended to support. Recognising such markers helps in identifying argument structure.

Option A:
Option A, “because,” typically introduces a reason or premise, not the conclusion; it explains why something is the case.

Option B:
Option B, “since,” also generally functions as a premise indicator by giving background or justification.

Option C:
Option C, “therefore,” is used to announce what is being inferred, making it a standard conclusion indicator in many argument analyses.

Option D:
Option D, “given that,” again introduces assumptions or premises rather than signalling the final claim.

Premise indicators are words that signal reasons or evidence being offered in support of a conclusion. “Because” usually introduces the supporting statements that explain why the main claim should be accepted. Recognising such indicators helps in breaking an argument into premises and conclusion. In contrast, words like “therefore” typically introduce conclusions.

Option A:
Option A, “therefore,” is widely used to introduce the conclusion rather than the reasons.

Option B:
Option B, “hence,” also serves as a conclusion indicator much like “therefore.”

Option C:
Option C, “because,” normally precedes justification or evidence and thus functions as a premise indicator.

Option D:
Option D, “thus,” again signals a result or conclusion, not the supporting premises.